Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2019-01-08T14:06:17Z
dc.date.available2019-01-08T14:06:17Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2579751
dc.descriptionThis paper was part of the NBIM memo ”On rebalancing” (February 2012).nb_NO
dc.description.abstractIn this note we dig deeper into the rebalancing question and examine how the Fund’s rebalancing rules have impacted overall risks and returns. We find that the rules for rebalancing have served the fund well and contributed to both lower risk and higher returns compared to a drifting mix portfolio. We also find that the Fund’s current rebalancing regime has provided both higher returns and higher Sharpe ratio compared to a calendar based regime with fixed quarterly rebalancing. Finally, we find that the current procedure with partial rebalancing, where inflows to the Fund leads to changes in the actual index, appears not to have had the same positive impact on the net Sharpe of the Fund despite its cost reducing effect.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorges Bank Investment Managementnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion note;4/2012
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiskusjonsnotat;4/2012
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe History of Rebalancing of the Fundnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeRebalansering av fondet i et historisk perspektivnb_NO
dc.typeOthersnb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber5nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal