dc.contributor.author | Claussen, Carl Andreas | |
dc.contributor.author | Røisland, Øistein | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-16T07:17:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-05-16T07:17:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2498267 | |
dc.description.abstract | The typical judgment aggregation problem in economics and other fields is the following: A group of people has to judge/estimate the value of an uncertain variable y which is a function of κ other variables, i.e. y=D(χ1, ...χκ) . We analyze when it is possible for the group to arrive at collective judgements on the variables that respect D. We consider aggregators that ful ll Arrow s IIA-condition and neutrality. We show how possibility and impossibility depend on the functional form of D, and generalize Pettit s (2001) binary discursive dilemma to quantitative judgements. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | Norges Bank | nb_NO |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers;7/2007 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | JEL: D71 | nb_NO |
dc.subject | judgment aggregation | nb_NO |
dc.subject | dependent variables | nb_NO |
dc.subject | impossibility | nb_NO |
dc.subject | possibility | nb_NO |
dc.title | A Quantitative Discursive Dilemma | nb_NO |
dc.type | Working paper | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | updatedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212 | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 16 | nb_NO |