Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSyversten, Bjørne Dyre H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-05T07:38:39Z
dc.date.available2018-07-05T07:38:39Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.issn0029-1676
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2504435
dc.description.abstractHistorically, banks’ solvency problems are often due to losses on loans to enterprises. Credit risk associated with loans to enterprises is therefore an important aspect when Norges Bank assesses financial stability. Two different credit risk models are used in the analyses, Norges Bank’s SEBRA model and the Moody’s KMV Private Firm model. This article compares the quality of predictions made by the two models. The analysis shows that both models are good at selecting bankruptcy candidates among unlisted Norwegian enterprises and that the SEBRA model is somewhat better than the Moody’s KMV Private Firm model.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorges Banknb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHow Accurate Are Credit Risk Models in Their Predictions Concerning Norwegian Enterprises?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber150-156nb_NO
dc.source.journalEconomic Bulletinnb_NO
dc.source.issue4/2004nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal