Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorQvigstad, Jan F.
dc.contributor.authorFridriksson, Ingimundur
dc.contributor.authorLangbraaten, Nina
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T12:33:09Z
dc.date.available2018-07-31T12:33:09Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-7553-718-6
dc.identifier.issn1504-2596
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2507015
dc.description.abstractA country has only one central bank. It is therefore logical to compare it with central banks of other countries. There is broad agreement on the objective of monetary policy – price stability – and on central bank independence in the use of policy instruments to reach that objective. According to international best practice, monetary policy decisions should be made by committee, but neither theory nor practice provides any clear answers as to which committee type is the right one or which form of work practice is best. There is broad international agreement that monetary policy decisions should be transparent. However, the way transparency and central bank communication work in practice will depend among other things on whether the monetary policy committee is collegial or individualistic.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorges Banknb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStaff Memo;2/2013
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMonetary Policy Committees and Communicationnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber18nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal