Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCao, Jin
dc.contributor.authorDinger, Valeriya
dc.contributor.authorJuelsrud, Ragnar E.
dc.contributor.authorLiaudinskas, Karolis
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T08:11:06Z
dc.date.available2023-06-27T08:11:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-8379-283-6
dc.identifier.issn1502-8143
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3073366
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we examine how a trade conflict’s impact on the real economy can be amplified by financial intermediaries. After China’s implicit ban on the imports of Norwegian salmon in response to the decision on 2010 Nobel Peace Prize, we find that banks that are highly exposed to the salmon industry cut back lending to non-salmon firms and households by 3-6 percent more than other banks. Furthermore, we find that the reduction in lending was not driven by the erosion of bank capital, but rather by the shift in expectations about the performance of loans to salmon producers, which drove highly exposed banks to increase their loan loss provisions and reduce risk-taking.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper;6/2023
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjecttrade shocken_US
dc.subjectbank lending channelen_US
dc.subjectexpectation shocken_US
dc.subjectJEL: F14en_US
dc.subjectJEL: G21en_US
dc.titleTrade conflicts and credit supply spillovers : Evidence from the Nobel Peace Prize trade shocken_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212en_US
dc.source.pagenumber30en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal