Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHavro, Gøril Bjerkhol
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Rønnaug Melle
dc.contributor.authorRuud, Jørgen
dc.contributor.authorTræe, Cathrine Bolstad
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-28T13:09:29Z
dc.date.available2018-06-28T13:09:29Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1503-8831
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2503653
dc.description.abstractIn autumn 2010, at the request of Finanstilsynet, seven Norwegian banks projected their capital adequacy based on Norges Bank’s macro scenarios in Financial Stability 2/10. A summary of the results was included in Risk Outlook Report 2011. This article compares the banks’ results with Norges Banks’ results. There is a somewhat greater difference between the banks’ loan loss projections and Norges Bank’s projections compared with a similar exercise conducted in 2005. The main conclusions from 2005 are still valid. The stress tests have not identified fundamental weaknesses in the Norwegian banking sector.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorges Banknb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleNorges Bank’s Stress Test in Financial Stability 2/10 Compared with Banks’ Projectionsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber39-50nb_NO
dc.source.journalEconomic Bulletinnb_NO
dc.source.issue2011nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal